Saturday, July 27, 2013

End of the road for Shelby GT350 muscle car (small block 5.0 liter Ford Mustang GT)


by Pearl Daniels

Shelby American announced that 2013 is the last year that their limited-run series of Shelby GT350 muscle cars will be available, and new orders are being accepted for all 2012 – 2014 model year Shelby American GT350’s through December 31, 2013. Their unique approach to making performance cars available began back in the 1960’s when they built GT350 1965, 1966 and 1967 model year vehicles in small numbers.
2011 model year 45th Anniversary Shelby GT350 coupes had a Competition white with Guardsmen blue stripe finish, akin to what the company had done with their initial car in 1965. In 2012, red, blue and anniversary black/gold celebrating 50 years of Shelby American were added, and their was a convertible too similar to the Shelby American in 1966.

As of January 1, 2014, this chapter of Shelby American history will close. Production of Shelby GTS, GT500 Super Snake and Shelby 1000, Shelby Raptor muscle truck and hot hatch Shelby Focus ST continue.



"The Shelby GT350’s rich history is well-documented,” said Shelby American Vice President of Production Gary Davis. “People value that heritage and tell us that they want this car to equal that exclusivity. We’re staying true to our commitment to deliver a small block car with high performance, unique styling and collectability in a way that honors our heritage.”
“The Shelby GT350 is one of the world’s most celebrated, iconic muscle cars,” said John Luft, president of Shelby American. “When we unveiled this latest version of the Shelby GT350, we promised it would be built for a limited time to preserve its collectability and value. So we’ve been preparing for this day since 2010. In true Carroll Shelby fashion, we’re planning our next ultimate performance Shelby model.”
“We’ve taken another page out of the ‘Carroll Shelby playbook’,” he added. “In the ever evolving automotive market, we continue to adapt to meet customer needs. While we’ll look back on the current GT350 with great love and devotion, as Carroll always said, ‘our favorite car is the next one we build’.”

Read more at http://www.rushlane.com/shelby-gt350-muscle-car-1285342.html#5i4My7MYg7tPdiou.99

Five classics you’d never guess are so valuable

By Rob Sass

Hagerty


Some classics wear their price tags on their sleeves. Look at a fuel-injected ’57 Chevy Bel Air, and it’s immediately apparent that it’s valuable merchandise. On the other hand, there are the sleepers of the classic car world, the cars that are worth a lot of money but it’s only obvious to those in-the-know. Your Accord-driving neighbor would, for example, never guess that the proceeds from a restored VW microbus could put his kid through college at a very good state school. Here are five you’d never suspect of being quite pricey:


Volkswagen “Samba” Microbus: There’s a simple rule of thumb with VW Microbuses: More windows equals more money. The 21- and 23-window versions of the venerable ’50s bus can bring money that would shock the hippies who ran them into the ground in the 1960s—around 70 grand for a nicely restored one. They’ve even been known to break $100,000 at the right auction.



Fiat Jolly: The Jolly was an open-top version of the classic Fiat 500 that was meant to be stowed onboard yachts and used as transport in places like Monaco and Positano. They have no doors, the seats are made of wicker and the tops are meant only to provide shade. Appallingly cute, the pint-sized Jolly can sell for upwards of $70,000.




Toyota FJ40 Land Cruiser: The classic Jeep-like 1960-1984 Toyota Land Cruiser was one tough vehicle—so tough that they invited horrific abuse, which explains the dearth of clean examples. A nicely restored one sold at an auction in Scottsdale, Ariz., last January for $88,000. We’ve heard stories of $100,000-plus examples. In response to FJ40s getting so expensive, first-generation 4Runners are starting to increase in value. Don’t say we didn’t mention it.


Ford Bronco: The humble 1966-77 Ford Bronco was a product of the same team that brought us the classic 1964½ Mustang. Unlike the Mustang, which sat on Ford Falcon underpinnings, the first Bronco was a totally unique platform.  The size and shape were just right, and collectors have latched onto them in droves. Totally stock, unrusted Broncos without cut fenders and flares are rare; it takes around $30,000 to get a nice one.


BMW Isetta: Prior to becoming known as the ultimate driving machine, BMW suffered from a case of bipolar disorder, selling the super-expensive V-8 507 roadster and the tiny egg-like Isetta microcar out of the same showrooms.  It’s no shock that the gorgeous 507 roadster sells for a ton of money, but the fact that Isettas can pull more than $40,000 is surprising indeed.
Click here for more classic car stories from Hagerty, or here to sign up for our Classic Car Newsletter


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2013/07/26/five-classics-youd-never-guess-are-so-valuable/?intcmp=HPBucket#ixzz2aGN5TH9G 

 

 

 

Friday, July 26, 2013

Mercedes Runs Over the Fringe with Luxe Golf Cart

Considering how much country clubs charge, a Benz golf cart seems like money well-spent.

 
Since Mercedes-Benz sticks its huge star on anything with wheels – cars, vans, buses, semis, bikes – the next step was golf carts.

To the folks who flood country-club parking lots with late-model Mercedes sedans and coupes, this could make a whole lot of sense. Most people, ourselves included, are absolutely terrible at golf and use it as an excuse to hold office meetings outside while drinking.

But no matter how many bogeys we rack up, we'd sure love driving around the fairway in an electric, solar-powered Benz golf cart with cooled leather seats and air conditioning.

So far, the Benz golf cart is only a sketch dreamed up by the company's design studio in Carlsbad, Calif., which leaned on other sketches and suggestions from Mercedes enthusiasts around the world. The equipment list borrows many features from the company's luxury cars –  and, we might add, copies the golf ball body style of the Renault Twizy, a tiny 2-seat electric car on sale in Europe.

The design study was released at the conclusion of the Open Championship in Scotland last Sunday, which saw Phil Mickelson take home the victor's Claret Jug.


Here's the rundown of the ridiculous pampering:
  • Stereo system with Bluetooth, USB and iPad/iPhone docking
  • Electrochromic dimming windshield with wipers and rain sensors
  • Heated and ventilated seats with Airscarf, which blows warm air on the neck
  • Speedometer with head-up display
  • LED headlights with floodlight to illuminate the next play
  • Fridge
  • Vanity mirrors (requested by the ladies, Mercedes said)
  • Air conditioning with optional doors
  • Internet connection with weather radar and direct communication with the clubhouse and other carts
  • Digital scorecard
  • "Fore button" to warn other carts of incoming shots
  • Retractable lightning rod


Mercedes was silent on wheel choices, paint and exactly what features would need to be bundled with its other overpriced option packages. Regardless, we would prefer a hovercraft feature with underwater sonar to recover drowned balls, an AMG edition with carbon ceramic disc brakes, an automatic hole-in-one guidance system and a camouflage system that would let us sneak onto the course midway without paying.

Really, anything goes, so let's have at it.

[Source: Daimler]

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Porsche, Ram top list of car brands with highest APEAL

 
Published July 24, 2013
FoxNews.com
 

Apparently, you still get your money’s worth.
J.D. Power’s annual U.S. Automotive Performance, Execution and Layout (APEAL) Study was dominated by luxury brands.
Porsche topped the charts for 2013 by a large margin over Audi, BMW Land Rover and Lexus.
The highest ranking U.S. brand was seventh place Cadillac, followed by Lincoln in ninth and Ram in eleventh making Chrysler’s truck division the highest rated non-premium brand.
However, the Ram 1500 lost out to the Chevrolet Avalanche and Ford F-150 in the large truck category, while Volkswagen took home five segment wins, General Motors four and Ford three.
Pulling up the rear on this year’s list were Subaru, Mitsubishi and Smart, which scored 739 points out of a possible 1,000, compared to Porsche’s 884.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2013/07/24/porsche-ram-top-list-car-brands-with-highest-apeal/?intcmp=features#ixzz2a1sKjxW4

Five supercars that brought new technology to driving




Digital Trends


Technology is a moving target. Today’s high-tech automotive flagship can seemingly be easily be supplanted by another car with more innovations or a more refined, better-performing version of existing technologies.
Still, someone has to get there first.
The five automobiles listed here each made an important technological first step that changed the way cars are designed and built. The fact that each was ultimately supplanted by something even more fantastic shows just how persistent the pace of automotive evolution is.
Today, each of these five cars remains a technological benchmark of its era.


1960s: Lamborghini Miura

The Miura was not just a radical leap forward in car design; it also created the ultimate category of car: the supercar.
There were many fast, exotic cars before the Miura, but this Italian legend introduced the template that all modern supercars, from Lambo’s own Aventador to the high-tech hybrid LaFerrari, follow. By putting the engine in the middle, Lamborghini opened the floodgates. Most road cars of the period had their engines where one normally expects to find them, in the front. In 1965, Lambo’s engineers decided to turn their car’s engine sideways (known as transverse mounting, similar to what you’ll find in most modern front-wheel drive cars) and mount it behind the driver. This improved weight distribution and allowed for a smaller package.
In fact, the packaging was so tight that once the 4.0-liter V12 was wedged into the chassis, there was hardly room for anything else. Lambo solved the problem by merging the transmission and differential into one transaxle. Everything was cloaked in a shape for the ages, courtesy of Italian styling house Bertone.
The Miura’s bare chassis was shown at the 1965 Turin Salon; a fully-clothed prototype was unveiled at the 1966 Geneva Motor Show the following spring. The car went into production later that year and kept rolling out of Sant’Agata Bolognese factory until 1972, when it was replaced by the equally outrageous Countach.

1970s: BMW M1

The words “BMW” and “supercar” seem like they belong together, but the story of the M1 shows that reality is much more complicated. A car’s technological sophistication can’t ensure its success. In the late 1970s, BMW was just beginning to assert itself as a dominant automotive force, so it decided to build a supercar.
Not having any experience doing that, it commissioned Lamborghini to build the body and chassis.BMW did know a lot about engine design, though, so it created a world beater for the M1. The 3.5-liter M88 inline-six was a clean-sheet design, featuring six individual throttle bodies, four valves per cylinder (highly exotic for the day), and Kugelfischer mechanical fuel injection. That added up to 272 horsepower and 243 pound-feet of torque. The competition from Ferrari and Lamborghini had more power, but they also had twice the cylinders.
Sounds pretty impressive so far, but the birthing process got complicated for the M1.
Lamborghini’s financial troubles soon forced BMW to take over the project completely. In the confusion, only 456 M1s were made, and those cars were nearly impossible to sell. In the midst of the late ‘70s economic malaise, few people were interested in a supercar from a maker of German luxury sedans.
However, the M1 still has an important legacy.
BMW transplanted its M88 engine into the E28 5 Series to create the first M5; the M Division was born. Thirty-five years and several generations of M5, M3, and M6 cars later, BMW is coming full circle with the i8, a new supercar that will rely heavily on the prestige of its M forebears – all the way back to the landmark M1 – to attract buyers.


1980s: Porsche 959

The 959 may look like a 911 that’s melted a bit, but it brings an impressive array of tech and gadgets to the party. Welcome to the first wired performance car. Today’s drivers are used to having electronics adjust their cars’ behavior, and that all started with the 959. Among its many innovative features were an all-wheel drive system with adjustable torque split, electronically controlled suspension with adjustable damping and ride height.
Lightweight materials also played a big role. The body panels were made of Kevlar and fiberglass-reinforced plastic, while the wheels were magnesium. A turbocharged (this was the ‘80s after all) 2.8-liter flat-six powered the 959, producing 450 hp and 370 lb-ft. That was enough to get this Porsche to 200 mph, making it the world’s fastest production car when it debuted in 1986.
Originally developed for Group B rallying, Porsche decided to continue with production of the car after that class of fire-breathing racer was eliminated. When it did go on sale, the 959 didn’t just indicate changing times with its tech. Whereas previous supercars had actors and rock stars as celebrity owners, the 959’s most famous owner was Bill Gates.


1990s: McLaren F1

How can you argue with a car with an engine compartment lined with gold?
The McLaren F1’s blinged-out bay wasn’t just a publicity stunt; it showed how committed this race team-turned-car builder was to building the ultimate road car. McLaren said it needed the gold because it was good at reflecting heat, not a small detail in the F1. Mounted in that engine bay was a 6.1-liter V12 developed by BMW’s M Division. It produced 627 hp and 479 lb-ft and, as in a race car, the rear suspension was bolted directly to it.
Another exotic material, carbon fiber, made up the body and chassis; the F1 was the first production car to be built this way. The chassis was designed with an integrated roll cage, forming a “survival cell” that could be the father of the “LifeDrive” chassis of BMW’s upcoming i cars. Even the seating position was unorthodox. McLaren placed the driver’s seat in the middle, with two passenger seats on either side, giving the driver what must be one of the best views in all of cardom.
The result was the fastest production car of the 20th century, with a top speed of 240 mph. Some car lovers still argue that the F1 is better to drive than the current top-speed record holder, which is…


2000s: Bugatti Veyron

Every gearhead can recite the specs by heart: Sixteen cylinders. Four turbochargers. One thousand and one horsepower. One million dollars. The Bugatti Veyron isn’t just an exercise in excess; it’s one of the few cars that has reached the level of epoch-defining engineering achievement.
The Veyron is the ultimate car in the same way that the Concorde was the ultimate airliner: it was built purely to push the envelope. The Concorde was built to meet a specific performance target, and so was the Veyron. In 1998, Volkswagen Group purchased Bugatti, and the group’s boss, Ferdinand Piëch decided to build the world’s fastest car.
The idea of a quad-turbocharged W16 Bugatti hypercar seemed ludicrous, and it was. Through the Veyron’s tortured development, engineers had to do things like fit it with 10 radiators and develop special tires that could still only survive 50 minutes of driving at the car’s insane top speed. But on top of that tech and power, the Veyron had to be comfortable and luxurious, befitting a car that was as expensive as it was fast.
The mission was accomplished: The original Veyron 16.4 achieved 253 mph in 2005. When the SSC Ultimate Aero overtook it in 2007, Bugatti came back with the Veyron Super Sport, which still holds the world record at 267.8 mph.
Eventually, a new high-tech car will be added to this list. Will it be a super-performance hybrid? An electron-powered ultra EV? Only time will tell.
The post Five supercars that brought new technology to driving appeared first on Digital Trends.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2013/07/23/five-supercars-that-brought-new-technology-to-driving/?intcmp=features#ixzz2Zybrrw6v

Citroën Truckette - Bare-Bones Simplicity is the Hallmark of this Hardworking Hauler

 

Feature Article from Hemmings Motor News
Today, work trucks come equipped with all of the comfort and convenience features that their daily driver counterparts have had for years. But it wasn't long ago that the phrase "work vehicle" was used to connote bare-bones simplicity. If you got a floormat, you were fortunate. Then there's the Citroën Truckette, which takes bare-bones simplicity to the nth degree.

They were, rather obviously, based on the Citroën 2CV, variants of which sold more than 9 million cars between 1949 and 1990. With the exception of the rear cargo box, the Truckette is cosmetically and mechanically identical to its car cousin. They were built in France between the years of 1951 and 1981, and were the work vehicles for just about every tradesman in the country. Put Jacques Tati's Mon Oncle or any of the early Pink Panther movies in your Netflix queue and you'll see these things buzzing all over the countryside. They were perfectly suited to the purpose. Small and maneuverable enough to compete in city traffic, their size also allowed them to minimize the tax bill levied on commercial vehicles.

Families looking for a bit more utility could purchase a Truckette, fit it with a rear seat and a couple of flat windows, and have a vehicle that served double duty as a family hauler and a rugged work vehicle.

You'll remember that when the 2CV was at its most popular in France, longer, lower, wider cars were the fad here, so consequently, these weird little French cars were imported in microscopic numbers. The Truckette's importation was even smaller, if it officially existed at all. The Citroën Concours of America notes that there are probably between 100 and 150 in the United States now, and almost all of them were imported by enthusiasts.

"Finding a low-mileage, perfect Truckette in France is not an easy task," notes the CCA's Web site, www.citroen-ca.com, "as most have seen heavy commercial use." But take heart: If you do find one that needs repair, better than 90 percent of the Truckette's mechanical parts (including new galvanized steel frames) are interchangeable with the 2CV.

The price you'll pay for a Truckette vastly differs, depending upon whom you buy it from. Buy one at the spur of the moment at an auction and you can get burned. Buy one from a known Citroën enthusiast, who knows you're one too, and you could go home with a decent truck for $7,500 to $8,500.

A final, interesting sidenote. Citroën Truckettes were wildly popular in Japan. To the point that in the 1990s, Nissan developed a vehicle called the S-Cargo (get it? Escargot?) that looked like a modern Truckette. S-Cargos were never sold in the United States, but they do come up for sale through Canada from time to time.

This article originally appeared in the February, 2008 issue of Hemmings Motor News.
 
1978 Citroen 2CV 250 Truckette For Sale $10,995!
www.automaniagp.com
 
For decades I have been looking for a Citroen 2CV with a van body, know as a 250 Truckette. Last year, I found this car on eBay and purchased it without a moment's hesitation from a seller north of Seattle. It ran well and there were no rust holes on the frame or body and I was an instant owner.

The second time I drove it when I had returned home I realized I was scrapping my knee against the steering column (6'3") as I got in and out of the car. About 30 times later, I have decided that I do not fit inside the car and I should list it for sale. I got to spend the winter resolving minor mechanical and interior issues and it drives great, if a top speed of 64mph is acceptable. It has a 602 cubic inch, air cooled, two cylinder engine in front with a 4 speed transmission shifted by a lever through the dash. Everything works except for the single fog light on the front. The valves were adjusted, the plugs replaced, the oil and filter replaced, all of the lights blink or do their job, and the tires have about 90% left.

If you are looking to make everyone you see in traffic smile, this little Truckette has the market cornered. There will be no drag racing, but it will easily keep up with traffic (highway travel is probably something to be thought out) and in fact, diehard fans of the 2CV have driven them around the world a time or two. It has disk brakes in front, drums in the back. You can haul about 500#'s in the back before it looks overwhelmed, I have heard of a lot more going in, but it seems almost cruel.

Businesses around the world use the car for promoting their work place, Wine Shops, Bakeries, Cheese Stores, anything of an eclectic nature would be served well by the use of the 2CV 250. Just look at it!

The selling price is $10,995. For other interesting bikes and collectable vehicles, visit our web site http://www.automaniagp.com 541 479 8888 or come by and see us at 895 SE Gladiola Drive, Grants Pass, Oregon, 97526. Oregon Dealer DA1287.
 


 
 

 

Monday, July 22, 2013

BMW i3 electric car price announced

 
Published July 22, 2013
FoxNews.com
 
BMW has announced pricing for its first series production electric car, and it’s either a little or a lot, depending on your point of view.
The i3 compact will cost $42,275 when it hits showrooms next year to compete against the likes of the $35,995 Ford Focus Electric and $29,650 Nissan Leaf, as well as the $71,070 Tesla Model S.
The i3 is built on an entirely unique platform designed specifically to be an electric car that’s constructed from a combination of aluminum and carbon fiber reinforced plastic produced at a facility in Washington State to keep the weight of the vehicle to a minimum.
The production i3 will be revealed at an event on July 29th, but rear-wheel-drive hatchback is powered by a rear-mounted 170 hp motor and expected to be able to go between 80 and 100 miles per charge of its 22 kilowatt-hour battery pack.
The low end of that range is similar to that of both the Ford and Nissan, but about half of the 208 miles-per-charge Model S.
Envisioned to be primarily used as an urban commuter vehicle, BMW nevertheless promises a driving experience worthy of the company’s reputation for sporty and luxurious cars and cabin accommodations similar in size and quality to its current 3-Series sedan.
While the automaker says the battery can be charged to 50 percent capacity in just 20 minutes at a public fast-charging station, a hybrid version equipped with range extending two-cylinder motor to generate electricity for longer trips will be available, but pricing for that model has not yet been revealed.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2013/07/22/bmw-i3-electric-car-price-revealed/?intcmp=HPBucket#ixzz2Zpbe8RDi

2014 Mercedes-Benz S63 AMG Revealed

Latest AMG variant has 577 hp, scoots to 60 mph in 4 seconds.

 
The Mercedes-Benz  AMG performance-car division has officially revealed its new 577-hp S63 AMG ahead of the rapid sedan's public Frankfurt motor show debut in September.


Several traditional AMG styling mods distinguish the S63 from recently introduced but lesser S-class models. They include a deep new front bumper, chromed blade grille, twin-turbo V8 badges on the side and beefed-up sills. The new bad boy is planned for U.S. sale in November wearing a $140,000 sticker -- about the same as the outgoing car.
In long-wheelbase form, the new S63 weighs 4,400 pounds -- 220 pounds less than its predecessor despite being slightly bigger and having more standard equipment.

AMG's 5.5-liter, twin-turbo V8 powers the car, reworked to develop 577 hp, 41 more than the old S63. Torque? To put it mildly, a stout 664 lb-ft between 2,250 and 3,750 rpm.
The direct-injection gas engine already meets EU6 emission regulations, with 23.3 mpg combined on the European test procedure. Power is again channeled through AMG's seven-speed MCT (multi-clutch transmission) with three driving modes: controlled efficiency, sport and manual -- the former brings an automatic stop/start function.


Following other new AMG models, four-wheel drive is standard. The car will rocket to 62 mph in just 4.0 seconds, a half-second quicker than the old model. To compare, the Audi S8 runs a 4.0-liter, 513-hp twin-turbocharged V8 and will hit 62 mph in 4.2 seconds.
The S63 AMG 4Matic's suspension is conventional steel springs and Mercedes-Benz's new ADS Plus adaptive damping system, providing continuous adjustment in two modes: comfort and sport. It also receives revised geometry with added camber and a larger antiroll bar up front along with a stiffer rear subframe. The standard 19-inch forged aluminum wheels measure 8.5 inches in width front and 9.5 inches rear, and come with 255/45 and 285/40 profile tires front/rear. Optional 20s will be available in the same width.

Further options for the S63 AMG include carbon-ceramic brakes for the first time and an extensive list of other high-end extras.



-- Greg Kable

Content provided by Autoweek.
Get more Car News from Autoweek.
Get the latest Car Reviews from Autoweek.

 

Fuel efficient classics

By Yoav Gilad
Hagerty

Forget about a mountain drive or a blast down the highway. With fuel prices still hovering near all-time highs, even a cruise down to the local car show can drain your wallet. But owning a classic shouldn’t necessitate a large shareholder’s position in Exxon. In fact, you could daily drive the following classics as they sip, not slurp, fuel.
1. The Austin Mini was the David to the auto industry’s Goliath. This giant-slayer is a world-class rally-winning race car due to its Go-kart-like steering and front-wheel drive. Anywhere but on a drag-strip, the Mini’s razor-sharp handling, short wheelbase and quick braking more than compensate for any lack of power. Additionally, there are infinite engine choices and tuning levels, but even with a wilder setup you should see north of 30 mpg. What else would you expect from a one-liter?
 
2. A more mainstream option, if you prefer a true sports car with traditional front engine/rear-wheel drive layout, comes from across the other pond: Datsun 240Z. It’s as reliable as it is pretty and is currently appreciating strongly. It features a 2.4-liter straight-six engine that is just as responsive as the chassis. Forget the Toyota 2000GT, this is the classic Japanese sports car. As an added bonus, the Z gets fuel economy on par with most of today’s sports cars: about 22-25 mpg.
     
3. So too does another reliable sports car option that is also beginning to appreciate rapidly: the timeless Porsche 911. I recently drove one cross-country and back while enjoying 23 mpg. These German cars may be finicky, but once they’re running right, they’re as dependable as a Swiss watch (and much more fun). Want even better fuel economy and a lighter car? Go for its four-cylinder little brother, the 912, which is also less likely to swap ends on you if you get scared and jump off the throttle.

4. How about the Lamborghini Countach LP400? No, it isn’t remotely fuel efficient. But the Fiat X1/9, designed by Marcelo Gandini of Bertone (who penned the Countach), and also a rear-wheel drive mid-engined two-seater, is very fuel efficient. No one will mistake its performance for that of the Countach, but it is a good-looking Italian that gets roughly 33 mpg in normal driving.

5. Sadly (or thankfully, depending on perspective), fuel efficiency isn’t classic American cars’ forte. Most Detroit muscle doesn’t even dream about 15 mpg; big-blocks were racing engines detuned so that people could get more than four mpg, but not much. However, if you’re a fan of mean 60s steel, don’t despair: there are options that make about 20 mpg, have style and are cheaper to own and insure than their big-block brethren as well! For example, the Chevy Camaro and Ford Mustang could both be outfitted with six-cylinder engines, and while they certainly won’t set any speed records, they’re stylish, fun and relatively easy on gas. Just make sure you get one with a manual transmission, as the automatic will eat into that fuel economy.








     
6. Finally, the Chevy Corvair. Not a muscle car, but a great, modern-looking classic that featured a rear-mounted air-cooled (oil-cooled) flat-6, just like the Porsche 911.

Go ahead, pick any of the above, just because it’s old doesn’t mean it has to be inefficient. Then hit the road!
Can you also please add the following: Click here for more classic car stories from Hagerty, or here to sign up for our Classic Car Newsletter


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2013/07/19/fuel-efficient-classics/#ixzz2ZjuzZtdW

Sunday, July 21, 2013

Volkswagen XL1, wheeling a 262-mpg orb

 

Volkswagen XL1

Built as an exercise in how efficient an everday car could be, the Volkswagen XL1 gets 262 mpg — a figure that belies the extensive and odd engineering underneath, from the two-cylinder diesel hybrid to the slippery shape that eliminates a rear window.

Since the dawn of the combustion age, true car nuts have disdained gas mileage as the obsession of the weak-minded and unskilled; there’s no bigger punchline in the business than the Toyota Prius. The success of the Tesla Model S has begun to change the culture, but when it comes to supercars, faster and more powerful roughly equals better, while efficiency gets dismissed with prejudice.

Well, the Volkswagen XL1 may be the transformative alternative-energy vehicle, the one that finally arouses the car fiend from his gas-hungry stupor. The XL1 is a different conception of a car, a German engineer’s dream of hyper-miling. It contains no driving joy or spirit, just lots of cool, stripped-down design details, an anschulss of movement and MPG that gets an average of 262 mpg. This is ze car we’ve been waiting for.

The XL-1 doesn’t have a rear-view mirror, which makes sense, since it also doesn’t have a rear window. Other things not present in this car: Wheels thicker than a street bike’s, a backseat, or any semblance of wind resistance. It has a drag coefficient of 0.189, which, if you’re not keeping score, is almost impossibly low, less that your average bumblebee’s. Because of this, its engineers claim the XL1 can glide at reasonable speed on the autobahn using only eight horsepower.

Now that I’ve actually driven the XL1 on the highway, I don't doubt it. The thing is so compact and thin I’m surprised they didn’t just slip it underneath my hotel-room door along with my departure notice. The XL1 looks like a Blade Runner hovercar and drives like something from Disneyland’s Autopia, but without the attendant stink. Though it has an “S” mode, which ostensibly means “sport,” you’d be hard-pressed to detect such a function in the powertrain. “This,” one of its engineers told me in Germany last week, “was not the focus of our development.”
 
The XL1 represents the car as blue-ribbon science fair project. But unlike other megacars, which are built to maximize speed and power, this one, more than ten years and upward of a billion dollars in the designing, contains not one centimeter of wasted space or poundage. The engineers eliminated power steering because it would have added 10 kilograms. For maximum lightness, the core of its body and chassis is comprised of a one-piece molded carbon-fiber monocoque. The magnesium wheels get wrapped in custom-light Michelin rubber. The windows lower with hand cranks. There’s no radio — the sound system wraps through the Garmin GPS — and no place to plug in your smartphone, because Bluetooth is lighter.

All of this results in a car that weighs 1,753 lbs. Under its rear hatch lies a two-cylinder diesel that generates 47 hp, which would have been fairly weak in 1960, much less in the era where the average Hyundai generates up to 200 hp. The XL1 has a 27-hp electric battery, which can propel it about 31 miles on its own, up to 62 mph. It can fully recharge, Volkswagen says, in an hour and a half. The maximum speed overall, using the full hybrid drivetrain, is 94 mph. There’s a 2.6-gallon fuel tank, which lets the XL1 achieve a total range of 310 miles — since it can't be run at maximum efficiency all of the time.

The car is a design marvel, with a front that looks as smooth and modern as a Mercedes S-class, and a rear that doesn’t so much taper off as disappear into the void. Even the rear wheels are hidden by metal coverings, making it look like the car is balancing entirely on its forelegs. When viewed from the rear, XL1 is angular and beautiful, a shiny metal bolt, or maybe a super suppository.
 
 
In true supercar fashion, the doors open in dramatic gull-wing style, making the XL1 look like a personalized drone. When both are up, the car’s cockpit manifests dramatically, like a robot Easter egg. The trunk opens with less style, but contains a nifty-looking carbon-fiber XL1 logo, and enough cargo space to hold a small weekend bag.

Inside, the seats are high-end canvas, looking appreciably cool and sporty. Everything else is streamlined and light. The steering wheel has a flat bottom, like a race car’s, or at least a racing simulator’s. In general, “simulated” is the best way to describe the way the XL-1 drives.

To repeat, the car has no rear-view mirror. It also doesn’t have side mirrors, which the engineers replaced to reduce drag. In their place are side-mounted cameras, meaning that when you drive the car, you have to watch two camera feeds at once at once to not only monitor your blind spots, but every spot. “We are convinced that the side cameras are enough,” an engineer told me. “It’s difficult when you first start but you get used to it.”

I must respectfully dissent. The XL1’s other quirks, like the whooshing sound of the carbon-disc brakes, the strange growly noises the engine makes in diesel mode, and the lack of power steering, not to mention the raw, low overall feel of the ride — those I could get used to. It’s what you’d expect out of a hyper-miled car. You have to sacrifice a little comfort and performance. But for a car you need to drive yourself, one that contains no lane-departure warnings or other modern safety features, not having a rear-view mirror is just dangerous.

This wasn’t a carnival ride or a test-track. I took the XL1 into city traffic, in a foreign country, in the middle of the afternoon, and it was terrifying. Trying to wrench the steering wheel was hard enough, though I figured it out after a while. Also, I drive a lot of hybrids, so I didn’t find the lack of pickup in the XL1 disturbing. But I did find it hard to enjoy the fact that I was getting the best gas mileage of all time because I could not really see behind me. You try that sometime.

When I hit the highway, things got better. The XL1 was actually better to drive at higher speeds. It got up to 140 kmh in due time, and held its speed without trouble. Sure enough, I could feel the glide. It was almost counter-intuitive. These kinds of cars are supposed to be better in the city, but this one almost felt like a cross-country runner, tireless, with hidden reserves. Also, there wasn’t as much traffic, so it removed a certain level of panic from the experience.

Later, at a lecture about the car, one of the engineers said, “There are technology enthusiasts who say the XL1 is perfect, but others who say it’s not good enough yet.” I’m not sure where I fall on that scale, honestly. I’m also not sure that the XL1 really exists outside of an R&D concept.

Volkswagen has made 50 of them so far. They’re using a few for test-driving, and the rest are currently in the hands of fortunate Eurozone residents who won an essay contest about green energy and urban design. The plan, VW says, is to manufacture about 250 total, but they won’t say whether they plan to sell or less them, won’t say exactly when, and won’t give an idea about how much they’re going to cost. It’s only going to be Europe, though; residents of North America will either have to spot a rarity in the wild or see one in a museum in the future.

There’s also no indication of what extraordinary XL1 related tech, other than the two-cylinder hybrid drive-train, already in use in VW’s Up! budget compact, will appear in other Volkswagen group cars. I suspect that the XL1’s brave new ground in airflow intake will affect how we drive in the future, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see carbon-fiber creep as the public begins to relentlessly clamor for more monocoque. In the future, hopefully, more cars will be small and weird and cool and slow and awesome and really fuel-efficient.

Let’s just hope they have rear-view mirrors.